Residents of China’s Xinjiang Province Demand All Citizens Surrender Passports for “Annual Review”

Recent developments in western China have brought to light human rights concerns that should have the United States’ attention. On Oct.

20, the Shihezi Public sk© Security SAVER SALE Bureau Immigration Office issued a statement[1] citing orders from higher-ranking authorities that all residents of Xinjiang province should turn in their passports to public security authorities for “annual review.” Submitted passports are held for “safekeeping” after the review so that those who want to get them back have to get approval to travel.

Authorities in the region also require[2] residents to provide DNA samples and other biometric data along with their application for a travel permit. The Chinese government’s new policy of recalling passports started in May 2015 as part of a nationwide crackdown on “terrorism,”[3] which had begun in 2014. The aim of this policy, which is used to restrict and monitor the mobility of Xinjiang residents, is to prevent the Uighur Muslim minority group of Turkish descent living in China from traveling to the Middle East for training in jihad[4].

But Human Rights Watch[5] has blistered this passport policy in Xinjiang for “arbitrarily” restricting the freedom of movement. It is something that the U.S. government should likewise raise as a concern with Chinese officials. In the last decade, there have been several attacks[6] in China that national authorities attribute to the Uighurs.

The Chinese Communist Party considers Uighurs part of the global radical Islamist threat. However, there have long been suspicions that the Communist Party is justifying its tight regulation of Uighur Muslims by claiming it is a component of the global “war on terror.” The Chinese government adopted this anti-terrorist posture[7] after Sept.

11, 2001, but Uighur oppression long predates U.S. anti-terrorism efforts. The turning point[8] came in 1990 when a major Islamic-inspired insurrection in northwest Xinjiang province occurred. There were possibilities of convincing Beijing that less severe policies would have provoked less desperation and violence in the region.

But the announcement of the global war on terror may have given[9] Chinese leaders cover in taking a tougher stand and violating the human rights of Uighurs. From Beijing’s perspective, Uighur Muslims are an ethno-nationalist threat to the Chinese state. Located in the farthest northwest corner of China, Xinjiang is the only Chinese province with a Muslim majority.

In Beijing’s view, Xinjiang represents a similar political concern to Taiwan and Tibet. Demands for separation are a hazard to Beijing that threatens the territorial integrity of China and the rule of the Communist Party. In addition, the region’s economic importance seems to be a significant motivating factor behind China’s behavior.

According to the Financial Times[10], Xinjiang holds China’s “largest natural gas reserves, 40 percent of its coal, and 22 percent of its oil.” Furthermore, it opens the way to energy deposits in Central Asia and a “keystone in President Xi Jinping’s new Silk Road project.” Therefore, Beijing sees it as crucial for Beijing to suppress the unrest in Xinjiang and hinder its attempts to gain autonomy. Tension between Xinjiang and Beijing originally escalated when the Chinese Communist Party orchestrated[11] a migration of ethnic Han Chinese to the Xinjiang region between the 1950s and 1970s.

Even though Xinjiang is one of the two administrative regions in China where ethnic Chinese still constitute a minority (the other is Tibet), the local Uighur fear being overrun culturally, economically, and politically by ethnic Chinese.

Since November 2012, Chinese Communist Party Chairman Xi Jinping has asserted his goal of long-term stability with the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region.

Government policy toward the Uighur placed an emphasis on ideological indoctrination and a security crackdown on the so-called “three evil forces” of ethnic separatism, religious extremism, and violent terrorism.



  1. ^ statement (
  2. ^ require (
  3. ^ nationwide crackdown on “terrorism,” (
  4. ^ for training in jihad (
  5. ^ Human Rights Watch (
  6. ^ several attacks (
  7. ^ anti-terrorist posture (
  8. ^ turning point (
  9. ^ may have given (
  10. ^ Financial Times (
  11. ^ orchestrated (

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *